TELL : +91 0 99 08 87 07 06

 Mcmed International ®: Largest Journal Publication in world

American Journal of Oral Medicine and Radiology

Volume 5, Issue 2, 2018
Mcmed International
American Journal of Oral Medicine and Radiology
Issn
XXX-XXXX (Print), 2394 - 7721 (Online)
Frequency
bi-annual
Email
editorajomr@mcmed.us
Journal Home page
Recommend to
Purchase
Abstract
Title
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SURVIVORSHIP, CLINICAL OUTCOMES, AND RADIOLOGICAL ALIGNMENT IN PRIMARY UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY: ALLEGRETTO VS. EIUS IMPLANTS WITH NAVIGATION
Author
Dr Kale Rohit vasant1, Dr Gautham chowhan M
Email
keyword
Osteoarthritis, Knee implants, Computed Tomography, Radiological Alignment
Abstract
n this study focusing on patients diagnosed with medial compartmental osteoarthritis, we conducted an examination of 60 consecutive cases of primary unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) performed by a single surgeon. Among these cases, 30 were treated with Allegretto knee implants without navigation, and the remaining 30 received EIUS knee implants with the aid of navigation. The evaluation encompassed survivorship, radiological measurements, and clinical outcomes, with comparisons conducted at average follow-up periods of 8.8 and 6.8 years, respectively. Radiological alignment assessments were carried out using both long-leg weightbearing X-ray images and non-weight bearing computed tomography scans. In addition to radiological evaluations, clinical outcomes were assessed using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS). At the 9-year mark, a notable 88.9% of patients maintained survival. Interestingly, a trend emerged where malaligned knees exhibited lower OKS values compared to well-aligned knees, with alignment consistency playing a role in this observation. In contrast, despite these nuances, no statistically significant disparities were identified between the two groups in terms of survival rates, clinical outcomes, or radiological alignment
Back to Top >>>>