TELL : +91 0 99 08 87 07 06

 Mcmed International ®: Largest Journal Publication in world

American Journal of Oral Medicine and Radiology

Volume 11, Issue 1, 2024
Mcmed International
American Journal of Oral Medicine and Radiology
Issn
XXX-XXXX (Print), 2394 - 7721 (Online)
Frequency
bi-annual
Email
editorajomr@mcmed.us
Journal Home page
Recommend to
Purchase
Abstract
Title
CLINICAL COMPARISON OF POLYVINYL SILOXANE IMPRESSIONS FOR FIXED PARTIAL DENTURES USING THREE DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES
Author
Priyanka Priyadarshni, D.K.Singh, Harsha Vardhan Choudhary
Email
dr.harsha.hvc@gmail.com
keyword
polyvinyl siloxane impression material, voids, bubbles, tears,. Pulls.
Abstract
Background: Impression making of indirect restorations remains technically intricate due to the presence of voids, bubbles and other defects. Objective: The objective was to compare the defects present in impressions between three different techniques using hand mixing elastomers. Materials and methods: This is a cross sectional study. Three master impressions were made from each 32 crown preparations with three different techniques totaling to 102 master impressions. PVS impression material, putty (Aquasil) and light-body (Reprosil) viscosity combinations were used for every patient with the three techniques) single stage double mix technique ii) two stage technique with using a spacer and iii) two stage technique without using a spacer. The impressions were rated by two evaluators using Heine binocular magnifying loupe (2.3×) and the results tabulated. The results we represented as percentages. Kappa test was done to compare the agreement to various impression techniques with each other. Results: Among the three techniques used, the single stage double mix (21%) followed by two stage technique without using a spacer (35%) and then the two stage technique using a spacer (44%). Kappa test was used to compare the agreement of the different methods. Between Technique 1 and 2(kappa=0.532,p<0.001), technique 1 and 3 (kappa= -0.097, p= 0.5) and techniques 2 and 3 (kappa=0.025, p= 0.881). Majority of the defects were voids (59%) and bubbles (30%) followed by pulls (11%). The number of defects located at the margins were75% and 25% were located to their areas. Conclusion: The single stage double mix technique and two stage technique without using a spacer had a more favorable outcome in comparison to the two stage technique using a spacer using hand mixing technique.
Back to Top >>>>